Current:Home > MyTroubled by illegal border crossings, Arizona voters approve state-level immigration enforcement -LegacyBuild Academy
Troubled by illegal border crossings, Arizona voters approve state-level immigration enforcement
View
Date:2025-04-16 15:06:07
Follow live: Updates from AP’s coverage of the presidential election.
PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona voters have approved letting local police arrest migrants suspected of illegally entering the state from Mexico, an authority that would encroach on the federal government’s power over immigration enforcement but would not take effect immediately, if ever.
With the approval of Proposition 314, Arizona becomes the latest state to test the limits of what local authorities can do to curb illegal immigration. Within the past year, GOP lawmakers in Texas, Iowa and Oklahoma have passed immigration laws. In each case, federal courts have halted the states’ efforts to enforce them.
The only presidential battleground state that borders Mexico, Arizona is no stranger to a bitter divide on the politics of immigration. Since the early 2000s, frustration over federal enforcement of Arizona’s border with Mexico has inspired a movement to draw local police departments, which had traditionally left border duties to the federal government, into immigration enforcement.
The state Legislature approved an immigrant smuggling ban in 2005 that let then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio conduct immigration crackdowns, a 2007 prohibition on employers knowingly hiring people in the country illegally, and a landmark 2010 immigration law that required police, while enforcing other laws, to question the legal status of people suspected of being in the country without authorization.
Arizona voters have been asked to decide matters related to immigration before. They approved a 2004 law denying some government benefits to people in the country illegally and a 2006 law declaring English to be Arizona’s official language. They also rejected a 2008 proposal that would have made business-friendly revisions to the state law barring employers from hiring people who are in the country without authorization.
Arizona GOP lawmakers say the proposal was necessary to help secure the border, as they blamed the Biden administration for an unprecedented surge of illegal immigration. Record levels of illegal crossings have plummeted in recent months, following moves by the White House to tighten asylum restrictions.
Opponents of Proposition 314 argue it would harm Arizona’s economy and reputation, as well as lead to the racial profiling of Latinos. They cite the profiling Latinos endured when Arpaio led the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. In 2013, a federal judge ruled Latinos had been racially profiled in Arpaio’s traffic patrols that targeted immigrants, leading to a court-ordered overhaul of the agency that’s expected to cost taxpayers $314 million in legal and compliance costs by mid-summer 2025.
Kelli Hykes, who works in health policy and volunteers for Greg Whitten, the Democratic nominee in the race for Arizona’s 8th Congressional District, said she thought carefully about how to vote on the immigration measure but declined to share her choice.
“It’s so polarizing, and there are folks in my family that are going to be voting one way and I’m voting another,” Hykes said.
Proposition 314 makes it a state crime for people to illegally enter Arizona from Mexico outside official ports of entry, permitting local and state law enforcement officers to arrest them and state judges to order their deportations. Those who enforce the law would be shielded from civil lawsuits.
What to know about the 2024 election:
- The latest: Kamala Harris is expected to deliver a concession speech Wednesday after Donald Trump’s election victory.
- Balance of power: Republicans won control of the U.S. Senate, giving the GOP a major power center in Washington. Control over the House of Representatives is still up for grabs.
- AP VoteCast: Anxiety over the economy and a desire for change returned Trump to the White House. AP journalists break down the voter data.
- Voto a voto: Sigue la cobertura de AP en español de las elecciones en EEUU.
News outlets globally count on the AP for accurate U.S. election results. Since 1848, the AP has been calling races up and down the ballot. Support us. Donate to the AP.
These provisions, however, wouldn’t be enforceable immediately. A violator couldn’t be prosecuted until a similar law in Texas or another state has been in effect for 60 consecutive days.
The Arizona GOP lawmakers who voted to put the measure on the ballot were referring to Texas Senate Bill 4. The bill, signed into law by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in December, was supposed to allow local and state law enforcement to arrest people accused of entering Texas illegally from Mexico.
A federal appeals court put it on hold in March. The following month, a panel of federal judges heard from a Texas attorney defending the law and Justice Department attorneys arguing it encroached on the federal government’s authority over enforcing immigration law. The panel has yet to release its decision.
Other provisions of Proposition 314 aren’t contingent upon similar laws outside Arizona. The approval of the measure immediately makes selling fentanyl that results in a person’s death a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison, and a crime for noncitizens to submit false documentation when applying for employment or attempting to receive benefits from local, state and federal progra
veryGood! (124)
Related
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- A group of state AGs calls for a national recall of high-theft Hyundai, Kia vehicles
- Today’s Climate: Manchin, Eyeing a Revival of Build Back Better, Wants a Ban on Russian Oil and Gas
- Boy Meets World's Original Topanga Actress Alleges She Was Fired for Not Being Pretty Enough
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- A South Florida man shot at 2 Instacart delivery workers who went to the wrong house
- CNN announces it's parted ways with news anchor Don Lemon
- Pete Davidson Admits His Mom Defended Him on Twitter From Burner Account
- Sam Taylor
- Nuclear Fusion: Why the Race to Harness the Power of the Sun Just Sped Up
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Biden Administration Stops Short of Electric Vehicle Mandates for Trucks
- Contact is lost with a Japanese spacecraft attempting to land on the moon
- Warming Trends: Laughing About Climate Change, Fighting With Water and Investigating the Health Impacts of Fracking
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Prince William got a 'very large sum' in a Murdoch settlement in 2020
- Warming Trends: Butterflies Bounce Back, Growing Up Gay Amid High Plains Oil, Art Focuses on Plastic Production
- ‘Delay is Death,’ said UN Chief António Guterres of the New IPCC Report Showing Climate Impacts Are Outpacing Adaptation Efforts
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Inside Clean Energy: For Offshore Wind Energy, Bigger is Much Cheaper
In South Asia, Vehicle Exhaust, Agricultural Burning and In-Home Cooking Produce Some of the Most Toxic Air in the World
Inside the Murder Case Against a Utah Mom Who Wrote a Book on Grief After Her Husband's Sudden Death
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Prince William got a 'very large sum' in a Murdoch settlement in 2020
Why Chris Evans Deactivated His Social Media Accounts
Warming Trends: Weather Guarantees for Your Vacation, Plus the Benefits of Microbial Proteins and an Urban Bias Against the Environment